QuoraUpdateCancelAnswer WikiThere are many reasons for this, some good, some bad. If you were independently wealthy or supported yourself with an ordinary job and studied this stuff, nobody would care.

Need to buy a liberal arts homework 2018 zonehomework.com

That kind of condescending attitude from someone who lives off of other people’s money without their consent is more than a little irritating. Occasionally you run into undergraduates (and worse, academics) who honest-to-God do not understand the point of doing things besides science, or of reading books with words and no equations, which is like complaining that a book has no pictures. When someone in the humanities gives you disdainful elitist guff for daring to ask them why your tax money should pay their salary, it is quite reasonable to be a little rankled.

On the other hand, when STEM people dismiss history or philosophy or literature in toto (that is, not just the academic departments, but the disciplines themselves), they end up looking like overgrown sci-fi nerds arguing that computer games are better than books. (If any STEM types would like a justification for participating in such disciplines, I will answer, but first I want to ask why they’re on Quora and not in a lab somewhere.

Okay, I’m gonna catch some flak for this, but a cursory Googling of the phrase “Newton’s Rape Manual” shows one reason why a lot of people can’t stand the liberal arts.

A great deal of “scholarship” (using that word loosely) in the liberal arts is done in rigid adherence to, and in service of, a political orthodoxy that simply isn’t shared by the wider society. Even humanist academics admit this: Martha Nussbaum, a feminist philosopher, referred to one instance of this phenomenon as a “feminist assault on reason. ” The people who are most obnoxious about this are exactly the ones who refuse to admit that it happens.

Here's how to teach the liberal arts to high schoolers - forbes

Why? Because I want time to pursue things I actually care about. No, I didn’t get an engineering degree, I don’t drive a Lexus, and I don’t have a Rolex.

I don’t need those things, and don’t particularly want them. There is a section of our society that fetishizes “success” (which means making money) and are not fond of the liberal arts, or anything else that isn’t “productive,” meaning anything else that does not make money. 4m answer views→Why are liberal arts majors and colleges looked down upon?Most liberal art majors at colleges are looked down upon because they have a poor return on investment.

25 grade point average, you are bound to have some scholarship offer, but for the most part you are paying a significant amount and will be required to take out loans. So lets say, you end up taking out $20k in loans with a 4 percent interest rate and tacking on an additional $600.

Studying a social science puts you at a higher risk of taking longer to pay your loan back.

So what is liberal arts, and why does everyone in america study it

Psychology majors with a bachelor's degree started out at a median of $35,700, while sociology majors with a bachelor's degree reported a median starting salary of $35,400, and graduates who held a bachelor's in social work earned a median of $34,400 during their first year on the job 1 Jul 2014 - Last year she wrote an essay discussing the value of the liberal arts that tools that I gained from all of the difficult homework assignments will .

The first job I got as a employment consultant for adults with disabilities, I negotiated a salary of $32,000 and was being paid $900 bi-weekly.

There is virtually no money left over for anything else. If I am paying student loans, I could be paying anywhere from $300-$500 a month, and there is no space for additional cost.

When you consider food, healthcare, travel, and doing things unrelated to work, you are not able to. STEM majors?Anyone who chooses to go into Information Technology, Engineering, or Math, will have a better return on investment for almost the same cost as a Psychology or Sociology degree.

A job listing I found in my area is paying double, or almost triple of what a social science major would be earning into a entry level job. In todays market, it is not that liberal art majors are frowned upon, its just that the market has changed.

People cared more about humanities, art history, and social work in the 80s and 90s, but since the computer boom, colleges have responded. Employers like Amazon, Apple, Deloitte, and Microsoft want STEM majors, and are willing to come out of pocket. Those nonprofits in your town?Offering college graduates $35k for an entry level position in a big city is an easy way to have a high turnover rate.

It is unfortunate, but this is why when you go into a nonprofit, it is filled with senior staff who have been with the same company for 10–20 years and are now being paid the same as a entry level STEM 7 Sep 2017 - A liberal arts education, supplemented with technical training and extracurricular experience, can set students up for successful careers Can students still get good, lifelong value out of an arts degree? Do Your Homework..

A practical education: why liberal arts majors make great employees

Working with children with disabilities is great, but is your nonprofit employer going to cover your bills, groceries, car note, or a trip to Europe?It is certainly something to consider when comparing STEM to Liberal Arts. You share your most intimate secrets with your search engine without even thinking: medical, financial and personal issues, along with all the day to day things that make you, well, you.

All of that personal information should be private, but on Google i. Kendall, Math and Computer Science student at the University of UtahUpdated 42w ago · Author has 65 answers and 219. 2k answer viewsI know about the divide you’re talking about, and while I can’t speak with certainty for anybody but myself, I may be able to communicate some of my own thoughts as a STEM student.

In reality, I don’t think anybody can objectively say which field is better than the other 28 Aug 2014 - I was invited to talk alongside more senior liberal arts faculty about life at a liberal arts science department and how to get hired at an institution like mine. Apparently, some Do your homework. Study the departmental .

Getting hired at a liberal arts college | science | aaas

Subjectivity:STEM is a field that is supposed to prize objectivity, scientific rigor/scrutiny, and using the fundamentals of math and science to build things / understand our universe.

These things are considered next to godliness in STEM, so anything that questions that may put STEM fanatics on defense. On the other hand, it often seems that humanities prize subjectivity and varying perspectives — often the answer in humanities class cannot be pinpointed with absolute certainty.

In STEM, the opposite is true; the answers given by students are mostly either correct or incorrect. In the humanities, the answers are usually more vague, thus allowing more wiggle room for what many people call “BS. ”I think there’s a lot of value in both perspectives.

The world isn’t black and white, but a plethora of colors. This means that there are a lot of different perspectives to view the world, and that technically there isn’t an objective authority that can tell us which perspective is correct. On the other hand, science aims to understand truth as accurately as possible, and in that pursuit it often means scientists can tell people that their opinion is incorrect, usually in an empirical way.

I don’t think STEM has intolerance towards uncertainty, but rather intolerance towards beliefs not justified by evidence and reason — which at times feels like many ideas coming from the liberal arts are not backed by hard-evidence, which may make STEM people uncomfortable.

Economic OutputI think it’s fair to say objectively that STEM fields contribute more to economic growth than any other field of study at university Buy A Practical Education: Why Liberal Arts Majors Make Great Employees 1 by Stross did his homework by finding and profiling several Stanford liberal arts .

If you’re looking at it solely from an economics point of view, the contribution of Science, Mathematics, and Engineering to produce Technology that builds economic capacity is absolutely and objectively more significant than any humanities subject could ever contribute. Thus, because the modern civilization is built on capitalist systems, the dominate culture dictates that economic output is king.

STEM may be valued more than the humanities for the same reason that high wealth individuals are more respected in society than poor, but creative, artists and musicians. Difficulty and rigor of courseworkThere’s a also the pervasive belief that STEM coursework is more difficult and rigorous when compared to coursework outside of STEM — from my experience, this notion has merit.

Comparing my humanities classes — including up to Junior level humanities and social science classes — to my STEM classes is almost laughable in terms of workload. The senior level courses I took in English and writing do not come close to comparing with even the freshman level courses I’ve taken in STEM.

(Note that I’ve met students who are actually very poor at reading and writing while pretty good at science/math, and thus the opposite is true. While most humanities classes involve a lot of reading, research, and writing, if you’re a decent writer and pay attention in lecture, it seems to me that you can mostly ‘BS’ the reading, research and even possibly the writing phase of your projects. Does this mean that every humanities student does this? No.

Liberal arts homework - order a+ academic essay writing services on

If you do not pay close attention in class, read the text-book, and/or frequently seek help from TA’s / Tutors / the professor, you will score low on tests and homework. Beyond the tough tests, the homework often takes a lot of time because of the technicalities needed to know in order to complete problem sets.

In the humanities, it seems the homework is usually either an essay or a plethora of written responses to prompts, which — again, from my personal experience —seem easier to get full credit for than homework from my STEM classes. This leads to a large difference in time spent studying between STEM and Humanities students.

Another reason STEM might be more difficult is because of the abstract nature of science compared to the humanities. It’s much more intuitive to learn about cultures, their history, people, and the ideas generated from these things when compared to learning about more abstract things like atoms, electrons, DNA, integrals, functions, recursion, torque, etc.

All of the above may lead to the inflated ego of STEM students:From my experience, it seems there’s a kind of ‘elitist’ culture that’s bred within STEM. Something along the lines of … “these classes are difficult, therefore we are smart.

” The gap may increase because of solitary between fellow STEM students, since in some of the more difficult classes the students will band together in order to better complete homework and prepare for tests. This is not always by choice, but often by necessity because of the difficulty of the coursework. This may cause arrogance in STEM students as the idea of being an ‘elite’ and intelligent student starts to intertwine with their very identity.

In my experience, STEM students often think themselves to be smarter, more capable, and harder working than students outside of STEM — depending on who you ask, this may or not may be true.

Aiming for a security career? consider a liberal arts degree

For example, physics and math departments often house the most elite students in STEM because of the difficulty of the coursework, which leads to the pecking order that implies Physics and Math majors are more intelligent than other majors 11 Nov 2013 - It seems like everyone in the States attends a “liberal arts” college, no matter focused on particular classes, as well as more time on specific assignments. number of credits per semester, and in total in order to graduate..

In their defense, I think they have some credibility to that claim — physics and math are among the most difficult classes available to students at university.

Either way, somebody’s declared major shouldn’t dictate their self-worth, both perceived and real. Arrogance and ego don’t get you very far, but understanding and working together with people do — those are the things that should be valued in society, not some type of perceived pecking order based on intelligence, income, or major.

Either way, I prefer both STEM and the humanities. I think science and math are extremely valuable ways to understand our universe and use to progress society, but science can’t fully answer questions like: Why does the universe exist rather than not exist? What is humanity’s purpose? Does any type of God exist? What makes life worth living? What is the ideal society? etc.

For questions like that, the shortcomings of science are laid bare, and we must rely on the ideas produced by fields outside the reach of science such as philosophy, economics, history, literature, etc. And for that reason, I think the humanities are very important indeed.